Enterprise Cloud Computing Blog

Where Are the Telcos?

By Ellen Rubin

This week’s Verizon announcement about their new CaaS offering for SMBs highlights a strange situation in the cloud computing market. While Amazon has been growing explosively and MSP/colo providers like Rackspace, Terremark and Savvis have rushed to embrace cloud in their business models, the telcos have been slow to enter the fray.

Telcos in many ways seem like the most likely players to lead and ultimately win in the land-grab of cloud computing. They’ve got the huge scale, geographic coverage, existing enterprise relationships and experience in service delivery that would appear to give them unfair advantage. As noted in the Verizon announcement and some recent blogs, telcos have a “unique opportunity to position cloud computing as an extension of their managed networking solutions (such as MPLS-based VPNs), by offering ‘on-net’ cloud computing capabilities backed up by end-to-end service-level agreements (SLAs).” In fact, the networking infrastructure and ability to offer dedicated and secure access is one of the telcos’ greatest strengths since it addresses some of the key concerns about cloud security and bandwidth.

So it’s worth considering why the telcos aren’t yet a dominant force in the industry. To a certain extent, it’s taken a couple of years for them to perceive the threat of Amazon et al to their core businesses. The response has been primarily a defensive one, as noted by IDC’s Melanie Posey: “Right now they’re concerned with, ‘If our existing customers want cloud in addition to the traditional hosting we’re offering them, we have to have something too or they’ll take that incremental business to somebody else.’” Marketing announcements and pricing model changes have so far been the fastest and lowest-cost response to this threat. For example, some telcos are now offering per-month pricing instead of the traditional annual or multi-year structures.

In parallel, the telcos are doing the heavy lifting required to build new cloud services. A lot of the real spending so far in the cloud market is being done by these players: buying new gear from the server, storage and networking vendors; installing new software and management tools from the hypervisor and service management players; designing new architectures with the help of consulting firms; leveraging existing infrastructures from Terremark, OpSource and others, etc. This all takes significant time and money.

While this investment is taking place, there’s relatively little to see in terms of live customer deployments. But in the meantime, the first-mover cloud providers and customer early adopters are moving full-speed to test and improve their offerings and cloud footprints. They’re shaping and defining cloud requirements and best practices based on real-life customer engagements. The risk for the telcos in being late to the party is that they’re not getting the customer insights first-hand and are missing the direct experience needed for successful scale-out and service delivery. Without this, they could end up delivering too little, too late. Still, given the size and projected growth of the cloud market opportunity, there’s no doubt it would be a mistake to count the telcos out.

4 comment(s) so far...

Reader Comments

  1. Sankar Nagarajan

    September 25, 2010 3:24 AM | Permalink

    Interestingly, the top three Telcos in India seems to be taking a lead in this area!

    Bharti Airtel recently announced an extension of its Managed Services portfolio by entering into a strategic relationship with VMware

    Reliance Communications in 2009 had launched its dedicated cloud computing services and

    Tata Communications, a global telecom services provider also supports its own through TCX
  2. Leighton Jenkin

    October 03, 2010 7:58 PM | Permalink

    The largest Australian Telco is Telstra and it has dipped its toe in the Cloud market for SMB's.

    It has licenced Microsoft Dynamics CRM and WORKetc as CRM solutions. It comes out of the Telstra Business division that look after SMB's.

    Positioning is interesting as WORKetc is targeted at 5+ employees and Dynamics from 25. Both seem a little high up the scale as a starting point.

    WORKetc is an Australian developer of cloud solutions for SMB's.
  3. Geva Perry

    October 20, 2010 2:12 PM | Permalink

    Ellen - Good post. one comment:

    This is mostly a US phenomenon that you're describing. As the commenters above indicate, outside the U.S., the telcos are actually very dominant. I would also add Korea Telecom, Deutsche Telekom, the Chinese telcos, Eastern European telcos as additional examples of telcos taking the lead internationally.

  4. Walter Adamson

    November 03, 2010 1:01 AM | Permalink

    Interesting post as you have some good inside views. What I see looking at it from a customer-in view is a repeat of the telco-goes-system-integrator approach of 20 years ago, plus the "usual" premise that because "we have a billing relationship with XXX million SMBs" therefore "we must be able to sell them more XYZ". However generally these relationships are soured, and customers feel more hostage then anything else. For example, Telstra mentioned above, has a record number of official complaints against it this year.

    Also their channels are not the channels to sell cloud. Kids with tattoos who can shift handsets aren't going to get excited about the complexity of selling cloud, even it is made as simple as possible.

    As in the "we will become SI" days, they will win some customers. But look today, no telco SI made the grade and became sustainable with the exception of BT and DT/Systemshaus - 2, in the entire world! For SMBs they don't connect mentally, and for large companies the roles are so compartmentalized that they are not dealing with the right people. And the people minding the datacentre door see telco as a commodity and a telco is not someone they take advice from about their enterprise architecture.

    So in summary, they will undoubtedly win some business. But will remain not fish nor fowl and don't have the service ethic, the channels, nor the customer relationships which would be the basis of a sustainable cloud business at the scale they need. I think that their presence in this domain is overrated and that their "natural ownership" advantages are actually their legacy millstones.

    Walter Adamson @g2m
    http://xeesm.com/walter

Leave a Comment